This article is an example of pseudoscience questioning the validity of scientific theory. I think it's reasoning and explanation is poor and it makes little contribution to public knowledge.
Hide questionnaire
Do you trust this person as an expert on this knol's topic?
Do you believe this content is original and/or correctly attributed?
Did you find this knol useful?
Is this knol a complete and thorough treatment of its topic?
Is this knol a pleasure to read, making good use of layout, style and media?
Does this document cite adequate and reliable references to support its claims?
Is this knol as good or better than the top 10 search results on its topic?
Does this knol promote a product or service?
Reviewed knol:
Rating awarded:
Search for uses of this page ▼
Activity for this knol
This week:
1pageviewsTotals:
35pageviews©2009 Google
Comments
Write New Comment ▼
Write New Comment
Sorry! This knol's owner(s) have blocked you from editing, making suggestions, or commenting here.