The Pitfalls of Stereotyping Pit Bulls

Pit Bulls have a reputation for being aggressive, but research shows the attack statistics are due more to a rise in illegal dogfighting operations and irresponsible owners than to bad genes.



Jonny Justice, a
Vick's dog. Credit:
vickdogsblog.blogspot.com
When former Atlanta Falcons quarterback Michael Vick was jailed in 2007 for owning a dog fighting operation, officials expected that the dogs would be euthanized as was standard procedure. The prevalent notion, espoused even by the Humane Society and People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, was that dogs trained to fight could not be rehabilitated adequately for adoption.



The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals disagreed and convinced the judge, a dog owner himself, to allow animal behaviorists to evaluate each of the nearly 50 dogs rescued from Vick's Virginia property.


That decision set a precedent that could change the way abused animals are treated after they are rescued and marks a turning point in the debate over whether pit bulls are inherently dangerous.



Of the 49 "Vicks" dogs evaluated -- many with scars on their faces and bodies and one female forcibly bred whose teeth were all pulled out -- only one was deemed too vicious to save, while another was euthanized because it was sick and suffering with pain. The rest were sent to rescue groups around the country and after training and fostering, some are becoming pets in adoptive homes.


A July 2008 Washington Post article details some of the success stories:

"More than a year after being confiscated from Vick's property, Leo, a tan, muscular pit bull, dons a colorful clown collar and visits cancer patients as a certified therapy dog in California. Hector, who bears deep scars on his chest and legs, recently was adopted and is about to start training for national flying disc competitions in Minnesota. Teddles takes orders from a 2-year-old. Gracie is a couch potato in Richmond who lives with cats and sleeps with four other dogs."  (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/06/AR2008070602351.html)



As a result of the program, people are rethinking the bans on Pit Bulls as a breed and questioning breed-specific legislation and policies.


There is no "Pit Bull" breed; it is a term used to describe several breeds, including the American Pit Bull Terrier, the American Staffordshire Terrier, the Staffordshire Bull Terrier and the Bull Terrier. Cross-breeding with other types of dogs makes defining a Pit's breed even more difficult.

 

The United Kennel Club describes the American Pit Bull Terrier as eager to please, friendly, excellent family dogs, good with children. According to the American Kennel Club, the American Staffordshire Terrier is affectionate, reliable and an especially good child's pet.

 

Pit Bulls are being used for search and rescue, bomb and drug detection, and therapy. And Pit Bulls have been found to do better on official temperament testing than many other breeds, including Golden Retrievers, according to the 2007 results from The American Temperament Test Society.

 

So, are Pit Bulls any more dangerous than other breeds of dog?

 

Experts agree that while Pit Bulls, known as "bully" dogs, were bred for fighting other animals and can tend to be more aggressive toward other dogs than other breeds, their nature is to be friendly and loyal toward humans.

 

Pit Bulls were originally developed for blood sports such as bull and bear baiting. However, dog handlers often were in the pit during the fighting, separating them and treating injured dogs afterward. Any dog that attacked a handler was euthanized.

 

Last century, the Pit Bull was considered the "All-American dog." American Staffordshire Terriers were known as nurse dogs during the Civil War. Pit Bulls were used to sell war bonds during World War I, earned medals and even starred in "The Little Rascals."

 

In past decades, before Pit Bulls became popular with dog fighters, scrutiny was directed toward breeds such as German Shepherds, Dobermans and Rottweilers.

 

Between 1966 and 1975, fewer than 2 percent of all dogs involved in fatal attacks in the U.S. were Pit Bulls or Rottweilers, according to the National Canine Research Council. (http://www.nationalcanineresearchcouncil.com/canineaggression.asp)

 

Reckless ownership practices are the predominant cause of dog aggression against humans, research has shown. The behaviors include owners failing to humanely care for their dogs, chaining them up, letting them roam loose, abusing and neglecting them; training dogs to fight or keeping them as "yard dogs" instead of pets; and failing to spay or neuter them. More than 90 percent of all fatal dog attacks between 2005 and 2007 were due to one or more of those factors, according to the National Canine Research Council's report for 2007.

 

Chaining dogs, any type of dog, can make them aggressive and dangerous due to lack of socialization and the vulnerability the dogs feel not being able to move freely and escape threats.


Responsible owners should monitor their dog's interactions with children and other dogs and keep them on leashes in public, particularly if they own a breed known for dog-dog aggression.

 

In The New Yorker, Malcolm Gladwell writes about discriminating based on breed of dog and concludes that it is as reliable a science as stereotyping humans:

 

"I've seen virtually every breed involved in fatalities, including Pomeranians and everything else, except a beagle or a basset hound," Randall Lockwood, a senior vice-president of the A.S.P.C.A. and one of the country’s leading dogbite experts, told me. … The point is that it changes over time. It's a reflection of what the dog of choice is among people who want to own an aggressive dog. ..."

 
"The strongest connection of all, though, is between the trait of dog viciousness and certain kinds of dog owners. In about a quarter of fatal dog-bite cases, the dog owners were previously involved in illegal fighting. The dogs that bite people are, in many cases, socially isolated because their owners are socially isolated, and they are vicious because they have owners who want a vicious dog. The junk-yard German shepherd—which looks as if it would rip your throat out—and the German-shepherd guide dog are the same breed. But they are not the same dog, because they have owners with different intentions."  (
http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/02/06/060206fa_fact)

 
 

Sources:

 

http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/sports/20080202_VICK_FEATURE/

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/06/AR2008070602351.html

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/photo/galleries/vickdogs/

 

http://www.nationalcanineresearchcouncil.com/canineaggression.asp

 

http://www.animalfarmfoundation.org/section.php?id=5

 

http://www.pbrc.net/breedinfo.html

 

http://www.unchainyourdog.org/NewsAttacks.htm

 

http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/02/06/060206fa_fact

 

http://badrap-blog.blogspot.com/

 

http://vickdogsblog.blogspot.com/


http://gadab.blogspot.com/

 

Comments

Not nearly Lassie

It's interesting the author is from San Francisco where this debate caught traction for a couple of years after maulings became more frequent in the city and Bay Area, particularly Oakland. This debate deserves to be closed after the 2005 mauling and killing by a family dog, pit bull, of a 12 year-old boy in the Sunset:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/06/03/national/main699664.shtml

Last edited Jul 27, 2008 11:40 AM
Report abusive comment

60% of human fatalities due to dog attacks: pit bulls and rottweilers

Some of the references above, including the so-called 'national canine research council', are simply the opinion of one person trying to defend a favorite breed.
Try here:

http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/duip/dogbreeds.pdf

That's the Center for Disease Control's study on 20 years of national data on humans maimed or killed by dogs. The pit bull is a dangerous breed.

If the serious attacks on humans by dogs are caused by the way their humans treat them, then people who like pit bulls and rottweilers must be particularly mean and nasty to their dogs!!!

Last edited Apr 13, 2009 11:29 PM
Report abusive comment

Not Lassie

I'm sorry, but this article is one-sided and emotion based.
Approximately 2/3 of all human deaths due to dog attacks are dominated by two breeds: pitt bull and rottweiler. No, that doesn't mean that the majority of these dogs are dangerous; but it certainly does mean that the breed as a whole is a lot more dangerous than other breeds.
People who love these breeds seem to think there's prejudice against them, similar to racism against people. There's a HUGE difference: fighting has been deliberately bred into them over dozens of generations. In effect, they've been genetically engineered for it.
For most canines a fight can be settled when one dog backs down. In the wild a canine disagreement is usually over status, so evolution put this safeguard in to protect a pack.
When a pit bull or rottweiler attacks it's more serious: often it's to death, even if the victim never strikes back. The safety value, stopping when your opponent gives in, has been disabled.
To compare these breeds with golden retrievers is irresponsible. Most owners don't know the risk they take if their dog is overly upset by something a visiting child does. Yes, there are goldens who bite, but the odds that they'll truely rip someone apart do not compare to the odds of a pit bull doing so.
Try getting a collie to kill a human.

Last edited Apr 13, 2009 11:27 PM
Report abusive comment

Have Yearly Dog License

Why not have yearly dog license to check whether the dog is taken proper care of by the owner. If the owner violates it repeatedly they should be banned from having pets. It is absurd for any one to own more than a few dogs. If there was such a law in place, we wouldn't have so many dog abuses.

Last edited Jul 25, 2008 4:54 PM
Report abusive comment

Wonderful. Life-changing. Audacious.

Stereotyped pit-bulls also cast a dark shadow on society because they are reflective of our attitudes concerning stereotyping in general. Sadly, it will, and can't last until Sunday. Only the energy remains wider than before.

Last edited Jul 25, 2008 3:36 PM
Report abusive comment

Amstaff Cutie

About a year ago, we adopted an Amstaff (American Staffordshire Terrier) from a local shelter. He was identified as a generic Pit Bull on the papers. He is scarred from fighting, including a long scar down his back. I have been taking care of dogs for 35 years and I've never met a sweeter, more loving animal. He has some fear of other dogs, esp. fighting breeds, but he plays with our cat and with a coonhound next door. He is gentle and has never threatened us. It's been a great experience and I recommend it to anyone who has the resources to treat one of these dogs right. We've had to fight againt BSL (Breed Specific Legislation) banning Pit Bulls in our county. I honestly believe it's like banning a sports car because it can go fast. There are a lot of things that are potentially dangerous - that doesn't mean they will be in the hands of responsible adults. Lots more Bullies need help - http://www.harfordshelter.org/index.html .

Last edited Jul 27, 2008 1:30 PM
Report abusive comment
Elinor Mills
Elinor Mills
Journalist
San Francisco
Article rating:
Your rating:
Moderated collaboration
All signed in users can suggest edits to the knol, but these need approval from an author before being published
Version: 12
Versions
Last edited: Apr 13, 2009 11:12 PM.

Categories

Based on community consensus.

Activity for this knol

This week:

18pageviews

Totals:

3210pageviews
12comments