(i) Era of Industrial Revolution
Modern P.M evolved from number of significant inter-related developments prior to beginning of Industrial Revolution.
Prior to IRE existed several distinct Employer-Employee Relationships.
Termed as Slaver, Guild System
Initial State of Guild System seeded Per. Mgt for well-knit groups (Masters, Traveling journeymen & Apprentices)
System involved “ selection, Trg, development, rewarding, maintaining workers”
‘Wage Salary Admn & Collective Barging’ over wage & working conditions were in evidence.
But Economic& Social changes Overtook Old Eco-Soc-Political System.
Indl-Revolution used Mech. Energy/ Machines consequently start of factories with Larger workforce
Productive power/ man increased
Machine efficiency triggered further sub division of labor
Led to specialization in One-Task than skills in No. of Jobs
IRE Expanded Mass Production
Mod. Indl Corporations Applied Science & Tech to all Facets of Work
It affected Personnel Admn. System Profusely:
Work Place – home to Common Roof
Production Methods-Manual skills to Machine skills
Migration-Rural to Urban concentration
Separation- of Owners &Managers, Employer-employee affected
Mechanization- Women & child labor replaced Men
Complexity of Prodn-Process & Adv-Tech : New class of employees commanding power in Coy.
New Jobs suited white collars/ managerial groups replacing Blue collars /artisans
Specialization- produced Specialists: Engineers/Lab-Relation Mgrs/Safety Engineers
Ills of IRE:
Small Dingy Factories
Concentration of people & Machines
Unhygienic & Unsatisfactory Working Conditions
Working Hours: 11 hrs-Adult, 15 hrs-Child
Government – Non-interfering
Labor looked upon – Commodity to be bought & sold
Division of Work -Monotony & Boredom, no pride in jobs
Rules-Strict Discipline
Bondage- Live by clock or else fired
IRE: Brought Heights of Business & Economy but materialism, monotony, discipline, boredom, job displacement, work interdependence, poor working conditions, average citizen/ labor exploitation
(ii) Era of Trade Unionism
Shortly after Advent of Factory System, collected, discussed common Probs.
Initially Child Labor, Long work Hours
Later, Economic, Employee Benefits, Poor Working Conditions
Workers Joined commonly to ‘Improve Their Lot’
Underlying philosophy- Force Mgt to listen & redress their Grievances
Weapon-Strikes, Slowdowns, Walkouts, Picketing, Boycotts, Sabotage
Influenced-Personnel Management in areas:
Adopting Grievance Handling System,
Accept Arbitration as a means of Resolving Conflicts & Rights, Disciplinary Practices, Employee Benefit Prog, Liberalize Holiday & Vacation Time, Clear Definition of Job Duties/ Job Rights through Seniority, Installing Rational, and Defensible Wage structures
Managements Created:
Organizational Units to deal “ Union-Representative Relationships”
Sponsoring Unions as a means to controlling their Activities
Facilities, consequent to wage hike issues, to Study jobs, Improving methods, Connecting wage to performance, Careful selection of personnel
(iii) Social Responsibility Feeling Era
In the past, Employers were not very sympathetic towards employees
Robert Owen (1913) – A British Businessman, Reformer, Humanitarian, pioneered fatherly attitude towards the employees
Robert Owen believed that:
The Principal Socio-economic Environments influence Physical, Mental, Psychological development of workers
To enhance productivity – improve Environment by providing more of Satisfactory Living/Working Conditions
Devote More attention to Vital Machine (workers) than to Inanimate Machine
Owen Implemented Philosophy By:
Building Model Villages next his Mills.
Factory- unheard facilities: Windows, Ventilations, Shower Bath, & Clean Toilets
Schools- Day (children), Night (workers)
Child Labor- Min. Age Raised to 11yrs, later abolished
Treated Workers- as own children who must be cautiously guided, trained, & protected
Other humanitarians supported views, like:
‘If each one work for his own economic self-interest, Society will gain’- Adam Smith
‘Emphasis on Mutuality of Interests between Employer-Employee and on Division of Labor to enhance productivity on use of resources;- Charles Babbage
“Hard work high productivity were source of good wages and higher profits for employers” concept of Charles Babbage denounced by Unionisation
(iv) Scientific Management Era
Movement Began in 1900, Peaked in1930, Dwindled in Relative Importance, Remained Alive to Present Times
Owes to Frederick W.Taylor (1856-1955)- Father of Scientific Management
He started Experiments in Steel industry (Midvale & Bethelem Plants)
Taylor Developed Four Principles of Mgt:
The Development of a True Science for each job
Scientific selection of: Right Person for Right Job
Train a Person to Perform Job in a Scientific Manner
Friendly Cooperation Between MGT & MEN.
Taylor Believed that:
‘Planning be the Result of Mgt-Worker Cooperation, incentive provisions be made to compensate workers Financially’
‘Worker were untapped-energy source to be utilized if trained and treated fairly’
‘Anticipated the Modern Suggestion System & Recommended Cash Bonuses for Developed Suggestions from workers ideas’
By Scientific Measurement of Work most of sources of Mgt-Workers conflicts disappear – Time study, method Study Job classifications, Standardization of Tools, Differential piece-rate System etc.
Scientific Management Has:
Had great influence on Management and Employee- Employer Relationships
Elevated MGT. by Plan, System, Design but declined Mgt. by Hunch/ Intuition
Professioalised Management
Taylor’s Approach Improved / Led to:
Management Methods, Procedures & Supervision
Strengthened Production & Supervision
Labor-Mgt. Consensus on Mutual Benefits of Productivity - More Profit for Mgt, more Money & Better lives to Workers
Separate Discipline called “ Human Engg”
It Studies, ‘People At Work and Of Work Methods’
Studies, Equipment Design, Pacing of Work, Hours of Work, Environment of Conditions of Work.
Purpose: To Improve PRODUCTIVITY & JOB SATISFACTION
Taylor’s Approach After 30 Years Popularity
As it led to know that Mgt. Problems were result of ‘Human & not Mech. Factors’
Taylor’s Approach Stressed:
Need for Techniques that ensure higher performance at work
& Eliminate unnecessary movements gave greater importance to Technology than ‘Men at work.
Fragmentation of operation/ Mechanistic conception at work led to Alienation, Frustration, Conflicts, and loss of Production
This experience invited New Thinkers Douglas McGregor in U.S.A and Eric Trist in U.K
They pointed out “ Best Results were obtained when Human Beings were treated in Totality of their Physical & Psychological Characteristics”
Henry Gantt, Frank & Lillian Gilbreth Modified Taylor’s views:
Gantt propounded “Task & Bonus System”- worker paid Hourly Guaranteed Rate + 20% on touching Std-Output + High Pc-Rate for crossing Std-Output”
Frank Gilbreth extensively used ‘Motion Picture of Task done analyzing Body movements, led to Popular ‘ Laws of Efficient Motions’
Lillian Gilbreth produced First time book “ Psychology of Mgt”- application of Psychology to the Principles of Scientific management
(v) Indl. Psychology & HR Era
Psychologists Entered for Systematic Study of Personnel Problems
Father of Indl. Psychology Hugo Munsterberg
His Book ‘Psychology & Indl. Efficiency’ Owes Development of Indl. Psychology
His Notable Contributions -Analyzing Jobs in terms of
‘Mental & Emotional Requirements’ and ‘Development of Testing Devises’
Advances witnessed in Areas of – Selection, Placement, Testing, Trg. & Research Practices
Indl. Psychology Introduced & Emphasized:
Matching Employees to Jobs – Diff Jobs need Diff Skill & Abilities
Use of Personnel Testing, Interviewing, Attitude Measurement, Learning Theory, Trg., Failure & Monotony study, Safety, Job Analysis and Human Engg.
But Major Applications Areas – Recruitment, Testing for Employment, Job replacement, Promotion & Trg
Human Relation Movement Outcome of Reaction Against Impersonality of Scientific Management
“Human Resources M.Imptt. Valuable Assets without which other Resources are useless”- Top Mgt. Personnel.
Elton Mayo, Roethlisberger, Dickson Conducted Experiments at Hawthorne Works, Western Electric, Chicago (Late1920s- Early 1930).
Hawthorne Findings:
‘ Human & Social Factors (Not Physical Variables) Accounted For Productivity Phenomenon’
‘Special Aspect of Work-performance is to understand Needs of Mgt & Workers
Impersonal Relationships (worker- supervisor) be fostered to Realize fullest potential of Individuals & groups’
As a Result of this Experiment:
Employee Productivity Began to be Analyzed in terms of – Team Works, Participation, Cohesiveness, Loyalty & Esprit De Corpse Instead of ‘Engg. Terms’
Triggered ENTRY of Several Concepts –(Social system, Informal organisation, Group control of behavior, Equilibrium etc) into fields of ‘ Personnel Mgt’ and ‘Human Relations’
Scientific management treated origination as ‘Tech-Economic System’ while HR Movement viewed it as ‘Social System’
(vi) The Behavioral Era
Era is an Outgrowth of Human Relations Studies
(Began Around 1955; Major Impact Lasted 10-15 yrs)
Behavioral Sciences include
Sociology, Social Psychology, Psychology
Mathematical Biology, Medicine & Psychiatry
Anthropology, Economics, History, Philosophy
Research in these Areas catered subject matter for Personnel management
Behavioral Scientists are Concerned with the:
*Impact of Methods of Pay and Individual Performance And Effect of Diff. Leadership Style & Philosophy on total Org-Performance
*Job-design its Relationship to Personality Growth; Impact of Diff. Appraisal Systems, Group Influences and Organization Communications on Productivity & Change
Research Data generated used for Theory Building.
Three Popular Theories
1. Theories of Motivation
Maslow’s Hierarchy of Need -Higher needs cannot be satisfied unless Lowers Are.
Herzberg’s Two-factor Theory: Hygiene / Maintenance Needs (money, job, supervision, Working conditions) and Motivators (achievement, responsibility, advancement, recognition)
2. McGregor formulated Two-Management Beliefs or Views (Theory ‘X’& Theory ‘Y’).
Theory ‘X’ (Traditional beliefs , Hard Approach) – strict supervision, coercion and threat breed restriction of output
Theory ‘Y’ ( Modern, democratic beliefs ,Soft Approach)
3. Rensis Likert’s Two Basic Systems of Organizations – System I (based on Theory ‘X’Assumption) and System IV (based on Theory ‘Y’ Assumption)
is based on
This is Also Known as ‘ Human Relation Approach’Tries to
Understand ‘ Human Behavior At Work’
Utilize/ Modify Behavior to Achieve Org-Objective/ Employee Aspiration
‘H R-Approach Led to Development of Sound Mgt. Practices:-
2-Way Communication
Employee Participation in Decision-Making,
Individual Goal Setting (MBO)
Informal Organizations
Treating Work Place a Social System
Management Development
Management of change
(vii) Personnel Specialist Era
With introduction of Factory system, 1000 of employees under one roof were to be controlled to realize Org-Goals
Administrative office recruited Clerks/Manual Employees responsible to hire workers
Later concerned with the Recruitment, Selection, & Placement
Organization size grew:
Functions allotted to ‘Full Time Manager’
Separate Personnel Executives installed to develop - Systematic Methods, Job Discipline, Job Description & Specifications
Further Duties enlarged to cover ‘Employees Befits & Services’
Arrangements added to train existing employees – Training Manager appointed.
Ultimately Many Specialists introduced: Safety Experts, Physicians, Behavior Researchers, Labor relation Specialist & others
For Administrative & Org-Effectiveness- All merged into a single function’ Personal Manager’ or ‘Welfare Officer’
Subsequently adding:
Organizational Planning, & Manpower Planning, Manpower Selection, other significant problems of Mgt of Managers, Mgt of Talent power.
Change Emerged:
‘High Talent Personnel’ were the key Human Resources
Personnel management -TURNED into Present Day Structure
Emphasis Now is on “ MANAGEMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES”
The Present day Personnel management: Entrusted with 3-Chief Responsibilities
1. To Assist Line Managers in ‘Manning the Organization’ & ‘Help & Maintain Force at Optimum level’, through:
Recruitment, Induction, Placement
Wage & salary Admn
Trg. Key non-Mgt Personnel
Admn. Of Benefits & Allied Services
Dev. Of Employees Communication Programs
2.To Provide Task Force to MGT. in the Areas of:
Union-Mgt. Relations
Mgt. of Staff Development Functions
Trg. Key non-Mgt Personnel
Development of Grievance procedure
Development of Personnel Policies & Procedures
3.To Control Employee Services Functions
Housing, Transport
Promotion of and Recreational facilities
Financial Aid to Employees
Educational Activities
Conclusively
Personnel Management Entrusted with Multiple “ Personnel Jobs”
Social, Economic, Political, Technological & Cultural Factors Influenced Nature & Scope of ‘Personnel Administration’
History of Per. Mgt is Evolutionary and Not Revolutionary
Changes Occurred were caused by Gradual Cultural & not By Drastic Events
HRM Evolution-India
Indian experts account growth since 1920
This period related to post I-World War difficult conditions that called for State intervention & Trade Unions.
The Royal Commission (1931)- recommended to appoint of Lab-Welfare-Officer for selection of workers & settling grievances
The Factories Act, 1948- compulsory Welfare officer (workers 500 & 500+)
In course of time: Two Professional Bodies set up.
IIPM ( Kolkota ) & NILM (Mumbai), premier Traditional Industrial Centers.
Post II- World War & Indian independence- witnessed increased ‘Awareness & Expectations’ of workers
During 1960s Personnel Function began expanding beyond ‘ Labor welfare’
Labor welfare, IR& Per-Administration merged into emerging profession - Per. Management (PM)
Shift in focus towards Professionalisation of MGT.-Massive thrust to heavy industry (II-Five Year Plan) & accelerated growth of public sector in Indian economy
1970s-Shift in Professional Values - Focus from welfare to focus on Efficiency
1980s-New Technologies, HRM challenges, HRD- Talk of Professionals
1980s-IIPM and NILM merged, birth of National Institute of Personnel Management (NIPM)1990- ASPM (USA) change to Society for Human Resource Management
1990s-Emphasis Shift to ‘ Human values & productivity through people’
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Definition
Meaning (Semantic)
Scope of HRM
Objectives & Functions
HRM term: -
Relates to-‘People’ aspect in Mgt
Imply Philosophy, Policies, and Procedures & Practices relating to management of people inside organisation.
Getting peoples services, developing & stimulating them to higher performance for their commitment to the Org- objectives.
Acquiring, developing, stimulating and maintaining outstanding work force will contribute to Org-Effectiveness to sustain survival. Human resource creates organizations and helps them survive & prosper.
Definition & Meaning
HRM is a Management function that helps managers Recruit, Select, Train & Develop the members of the organization.
5-Essential Core Points
The definition must embrace 5-core points
1. Organizations Are People who staff & Manage Organization
2. Functions & Principles are applied to Acquisitioning, developing, Maintaining & remunerating employees
3. Employees Related decisions be integrated / consistent with all HR-decisions
4. Decisions to influence Org-Effectiveness. Effectiveness must cater to high Quality Products/Services at reasonable Price to customer
5. HRM functions confined to all Types of Organizations
Definitions
“HRM is concerned with the people dimension in management. Since every organization is made up of people, acquiring their services, developing their skills, motivating them to higher levels of performance, and ensuring that they continue to maintain their commitment to the organisation are essential to achieving organizational objectives. This is true regardless of organisation-government, business, education, health, recreational, or social action” - David, A.D & Stephen, P.R
“HRM is planning, organizing, directing, and control of the procurement, development, compensation, integration, and separation of human resources to the end that individual, organizational, and social objectives are accomplished.” - Flippo, E.B.
Therefore HRM refers to a set of Programs, Functions, and Activities designed and carried out in order to maximize both Employee and Organizational Effectiveness.
HRM Semantic
Meaning:
Alike other discipline, HRM also face semantic problem – Two terms personnel management (PM) and HRM
These, basically differ in Scope & Orientation
HRM views people – Importt assets for benefit of Orgn-employees-society
HRM emerging as distinct Mgt-Philosophy Promoting Policies on Mutuality- (goals, respect, reward, responsibilities)
Mutuality- elicit commitment then to better eco-performance & HRD
HRM – integrated to Strategic Mgt. of business. HRM – latest term in evolution
PM- limited Scope & inverted Orientation
Labor is as tool, manipulate & replace the worn-out.
Per. Deptt – was not respected and did have not-very-productive employees historically
Per. Function was used to do routine hiring new employees & maintaining records
PM was never considered part of Strategic Mgt. of business
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HRM & PM: PLEASE REFER SHEET
HRD, PM, & Indl.Relations
HRD- Trg., Development, career panning & development and O.D-Part of HRM
Indl.Relations- Employees’ grievances, Settlement, Unionisation, PM, and Indl.Relations are all PART of HRM
Scope of HRM
The Scope is vast. All activities in the working life of a worker- from the time of his/ her entry till he/she leaves-come under the purview of HRM.
HR planning, Job Analysis & Design, Recruitment & Selection, Training & Development, Performance Appraisal, Job Evaluation, Employee & Executive Remuneration, Motivation & Communication, Welfare, Safety, Health, Ind





Comments
Write New Comment ▼
Write New Comment
Sorry! This knol's owner(s) have blocked you from editing, making suggestions, or commenting here.