Tracking energy consumption
It's an oft-quoted statistic: the United States is the world's largest energy consumer (for now, at least - China is forecast to overtake the U.S. in 2010). On a per-capita basis, U.S. energy use is double that of some European countries. Just where is all that energy going?
As it turns out, answering that question isn't difficult. The Energy Information Administration (EIA), an agency of the U.S. Department of Energy, was created expressly to track American energy statistics. A visitor to their website will find thousands of tables, graphs and reports covering various aspects of energy supply, prices and consumption patterns.
The goal of this article is to focus on the EIA's consumption data, distilling it into a few graphs that should give even the most rushed reader a basic understanding of the layout of the American energy landscape.
The four sectors
Before getting into the details, a quick explanation of energy sectors may be helpful. When accounting for consumption, the EIA converts each energy expenditure to a common measurement unit (BTU's) and assigns it to one of four broad sectors, defined as follows:
- Transportation - any equipment used to move people or materials, via land, water, or air.
- Residential - private living quarters. Includes single-family homes, apartments and mobile homes. Hotels, dormitories and other commercial/institutional living quarters are not included.
- Commercial - service-providing facilities. Included are both government and private sector buildings, such as offices, stores, restaurants, churches, hospitals and libraries.
- Industrial - facilities used for producing and processing goods. This sector is dominated by manufacturing operations, but also includes nonmanufacturing enterprises such as agriculture and mining. Another separate category within this sector is feedstocks, which refers to fossil fuels used as raw materials for manufacturing (e.g. petrochemicals, asphalt, etc.).
Special consideration is made for the energy consumed by electrical power plants. Factoring in generation inefficiencies and transmission losses, only about a third of the fuel energy consumed by the average electricity producer is actually delivered to the end user. Rather than creating a separate consumption sector, the EIA adjusts end-use electricity consumption estimates to reflect the actual energy required to produce that power, not just the amount delivered. (For example, 1 kilowatt-hour delivered to a home air conditioner is counted as 3.18 kilowatt-hours of "primary energy" in the Residential sector's air conditioning category.)
Visualizing the data
So, here's the EIA consumption data, summarized in a treemap. (A treemap is basically a rectangular pie chart. In this case, instead of pie slices the annual energy total is divided into rectangles; each rectangle's size is proportional to that end-use's share of the total.)comments on this treemap...
gasoline
Some people may be surprised that gasoline isn't a more dominant presence on the consumption map. While gasoline-powered transportation is certainly the chart's biggest single element, it only constitutes about 17% of national energy use. So why does gasoline get the lion's share of attention from the press? Some likely explanations:
- Gasoline is the energy source whose cost is most visible to Americans on a daily basis. Other energy costs are seen only in monthly utility bills or as a hidden part of the prices of goods and services.
- Oil and gas prices have fluctuated dramatically in the past two years.
- Unlike natural gas, coal, nuclear and other fuel sources, the U.S. depends on foreign imports for most of its petroleum. Gasoline supplies and prices are therefore more vulnerable to political instability abroad.
lighting
In what has become an annual event, Earth Hour encourages people to turn off their lights for an hour to conserve energy and show they "care about the living planet". This well-meaning effort to raise consumer awareness may actually be misleading people about where their homes' energy use lies. As is apparent in the consumption map, lighting is actually the fourth-highest consumption area in a typical American home, behind heating, air conditioning, and water heating. Targeting consumption in those areas is plainly as important as lighting (or more so), but it won't be as simple as flipping off a light switch. Reductions in space conditioning and water heating expenditures require more basic sacrifices, such as spending money on weatherization, living with less comfortable thermostat/water-heater settings, or even moving to a smaller home.
electronics
The residential "electronics" category, which includes computers and televisions, has grown steadily in recent years, but it is still a fairly minor piece of the energy picture. An energy-conscious consumer may look with suspicion at all the boxes plugged into their home entertainment system, but it's a safe bet that in most homes the majority of energy consumed somehow involves heating (furnaces, water heaters) or cooling (air conditioners, refrigerators). Even the incandescent light bulb is essentially a heating device - the filament is heated to the point that it emits light as a by-product.
Energy consumption and climate
Global warming studies have suggested that the world's energy consumption (i.e. burning fossil fuels) is adversely affecting global climate. But the converse is also true: climate affects energy consumption.
This is readily seen in an EIA study that estimated household energy use on a state-by-state basis. The results of that study are mapped below:
Clearly there is a distinct regional pattern to home energy use. The states with the coldest winters (northern states in the continental interior) have the highest overall totals, while southern and coastal states have the lowest. This is not surprising, in view of the aforementioned fact that space heating is the biggest energy user in a typical home.
Other factors may also be in play. California, Arizona, and New Mexico are sufficiently arid to allow the use of evaporative air conditioners (aka "swamp coolers"), which consume up to 75% less electricity than refrigerated air conditioners. It's also worth noting that the Pacific Coast and Southwest states have seen the largest population growth in the past few decades, thus their housing stock is probably newer and more energy-efficient than in the Midwest and Northeast.
Comparing the U.S. to other countries
Ideally, every country would have its own Energy Information Administration, and then U.S. conservation efforts could be more easily weighed against other countries' results. So far, that isn't the case (or, at least, such a global database isn't readily available through Internet searching).But an Energy Consumption report published by the United Kingdom's Dept. of Trade and Industry provides a glimpse of the differences that can be seen between the U.S. and other countries with a similar standard of living. Fortunately, the UK report seems to use the same 4 sectors that the EIA uses, so a side by side comparison is easier. Adjusting for the UK's smaller population (i.e., converting the data to per-capita), here is how the two countries compare:
Obviously, even adjusted to a per-capita comparison, U.S. energy consumption is far above the U.K.'s. The industrial sector differences are the easiest to excuse; the U.K. may simply have a less manufacturing-centered economy than the U.S. But the other three sectors don't have ready explanations. The answer may be that everything in the U.S. is "super-sized": bigger cars (and longer commutes), larger homes, more stores that are open 24/7. Climate is probably a factor here, too. The U.K. has a far milder climate than most parts of the U.S. (London's weather is similar to Seattle's - the average July high is 73, the average January low is 38.)
References
Note: Although the graphics and text in this article are based on official EIA data, they are the work of the author, who is not affiliated with the EIA or the U.S. government. The following references link to the actual data tables.2006 Annual Energy Outlook, (transportation data is in table B2)
EIA residential energy splits, 2006
EIA commercial energy splits, 2006
Fuel consumption for selected industries, 2002
EIA Regional Energy Profiles
Companion knol: U.S. Energy Sources








nano
Invite as author
Barrier to Conservation: Fixed Customer Charges
For more on this, see this article:
J. M. Pearce and Paul J. Harris, "Reducing greenhouse gas emissions by inducing energy conservation and distributed generation from elimination of electric utility customer charges", Energy Policy, 35, pp. 6514-6525, 2007.[http://www.sci
Michael Walsh
A proposal: make every U.S. utility bill a matter of public record
Why do we need such a database? Because we currently have no way to determine if the residential/commerci
For example: my home used 123 therms of natural gas last month (an unusually cold December for Chicago). Is 123 therms a lot? I don't know! Is it more than my neighbors' usage, or less? I don't know that, either! And there's no way to find out, short of knocking on everyone's door and asking them to dig out their bills. How can I make an informed decision to weatherize my house or replace aging appliances, when I have no idea how my energy usage compares to local averages? For all I know, my home is already the most energy-efficient building on the block, and any improvements would be a waste of money.
The same applies to businesses. If an owner of a Burger King found out his power bills were twice those of the McDonald's down the street, I'm sure he would make a concerted effort to find out why. "Green" or not, no business likes to throw away money.
The dearth of data is completely unnecessary - local utilities surely store monthly gas and electricity usage information for every customer; it's just a matter of forwarding that data to some centralized server. The resulting database would be a monster, of course, but could be fairly easily maintained by the U.S. Dept. of Energy or one of the national energy laboratories. Designing a web interface to it would be straightforward. This isn't rocket science.
I suppose some folks would view such a program as an invasion of privacy. I don't agree. With a few mouse clicks, anyone with an internet connection can already ascertain my home's latest selling price, its square footage, assessed valuation, and real estate taxes. I don't see it as overly intrusive to add energy usage data to that information pool. The goal is to educate people, not embarrass anyone (though, in my opinion, Al Gore should certainly be embarrassed about the utility bills of his Nashville mansion). If privacy really becomes an issue, an "opt-out" provision could be made available.
Iain McClatchie
Invite as author
Sustainable Energy - Without the Hot Air
EditSaveCancelDeleteDeleteBlock this userReport abusive commentHide report window