Introduction and Reflections on the Knol project
| Help for Knol Authors |
![]() |
| Knol page snapshot, 12 December 2008. |
This is a powerful and flexible design that embraces and encourages collaboration. We believe that collaboration is the project's underpinning hope, its chief strategic differentiator. And collaboration has many modes at Knol: co-authorship (as in this Knol); open collaboration where readers can make changes directly; moderated collaboration where readers can suggest changes to authors; comments at the end of each Knol and reviews that are Knol themselves. Authors may begin their work in unpublished mode, publishing in an open or moderated mode when the infant reaches a reasonable level of maturity, ready for embrace by the world of knowledge seekers. As a Knol achieves stability, collaboration can be reduced. For authors who are pre-eminent experts and wish to write Knols in a mode similar to peer-review journal articles, collaboration can be turned off. In fact, Knol's launch was accompanied by many pre-eminent medical Knols written by recognized physicians and health researchers. These have stood the test of time and rank very high in search engine results: more proof of our thesis.
The engineering of the Knol project with its easy add-ons (such as YouTube and Google Docs), referencing and linking features makes it possible to write to high academic standards while providing a platform for an expert or journalistically-skilled writer to freely share facts, insights, even interpretive opinions that are anchored by the facts and creativity of the work. Writers are called authors because creativity is a welcome and encouraged component (compared, for example, with the flat, academically rigorous prose of an encyclopedia entry).
For actual academics and scientific researchers, while not replacing the traditional peer review publishing process, Knols speed the dissemination of important new information and theses into the public arena. Once here, a Knol is still capable of peer consideration through review, comments, collaborative editing and rating systems that the architects have included in the project.
- The opportunity to share your unique and sometimes uncommon knowledge with the world for some genuine altruistic purpose. By documenting your expertise in a by-lined pragmatic Knol, this project encourages self-actualized volunteerism on a global scale; ask not what a Knol can do for you, but what you can do for a Knol;
- An effective way to establish credentials and bona fides (good faith) as a global expert in your field; through your by-line, you benefit directly when your Knol is cataloged by the search engines and the topic becomes hard wired to your name. If you seek monetization, this process delivers natural commercial flow-on benefits as a consequence of expertise wrapped into pragmatic units of knowledge. This is called trust;
- The option to directly benefit financially from an article's popularity via the unobtrusive Google AdSense advertising program or via a single link to you or your firm's off-site products. Don't get too excited. We know of no AdSense millionaires via Knol, But the direct benefit is definitely there. And if you don't want the benefit, AdSense may be turned off on a Knol-by-Knol basis. In the long run, commercial enterprises benefit far more from point #2, which is the "if you build it, they will come" component of Knol.
- A genuine opportunity to exercise an interest in citizen journalism, with reasonably quick reaction (or not) to the stories you report. Do you have something to say about the sudden death of pop culture icon Michael Jackson? Would your story enlighten others? Could it survive fact checking readers? How about the Presidential election in Iran, settlements in Israel, nuclear weapons in North Korea or drought restrictions in your community? If you have a desire to try your hand at who/what/why/when/where and how, Knol will immediately expose your efforts to a global readership. There is a current crying need at Knol for fast coverage of current events in the mode of units of knowledge. Just remember, garbage in, garbage out.
This is reminiscent of a famous StarKist-brand television ad campaign for canned tuna. Customers don't want tuna with good taste. They want tuna that tastes good. Articles -- especially articles that claim to be units of knowledge -- have a singular purpose. The medium of the Internet should not get in the way. Peter is no Charlie the Tuna.
Peter continues. "I am not against SEO. However, I think that the pendulum has swung too far away from basic, informative article writing. This Knol has no SEO considerations in it beyond those that occur naturally from the creation of solid content. And our content shows that anyone can achieve top 10 rank without resorting to explicit SEO. In other words, you'll earn rank just by concentrating on good informative article writing together with some targeted "meet the needs of the market" strategies.
"I am sure that search optimizers can add further value to the visibility of this Knol. But it is hard enough for me to express my thoughts clearly without adding a layer of keyword-formulated complications. If an SEO expert came to me with a list of words and phrases that had to be included, and how many times they had to be stated, there would be one less expert in the world. Are we getting carried away with the math of SEO? Are we failing to see the frustrated human at the computer screen who just can’t seem to sort the wheat from the chaff with the mixed quality bag of search results that they get?
"You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time."Having said this, I do avail myself of the Google Keyword search tool, which helps me build both a title and a theme that best matches my target audience’s specific search requests. However, this for me is simply Marketing 101 and is not new-age SEO. I have also found it necessary on occasions to change my title when the original title is shown to be off target. And course corrections like this were well developed long before Web 1.0, much less today's Web 2.0. How many among you remember the case of the Chevrolet Nova? GM had to change the name of the vehicle for Latin nations because Nova did not mean "new idea" in Spanish. It meant "no go" or "no energy.
- The components of the writing; and
- Reader participation
| WRITING COMPONENTS (Top 15 Top Viewed Knols) | RESULT |
| Average word length | 0% less Than 1,000 20% 1,000 to 2,000 20% 2,000 to 4,000 60% more than 4,000 |
| % using a Table of Contents via the header formatting system | 87% |
| Average numbers of pictures and other media used | 7 |
| Average number of external links designed to inform (not to sell) | 19 |
| % that only posted this content as a Knol | 60% |
| % that used a reference at the end Average number of revisions | 60% 26% 1-10 revisions 48% 11-40 revisions 26% over 41 revisions |
| READER PARTICIPATION | RESULT |
| % of the 15 top viewed Knols that attracted reader reviews. | 47% |
| Average number of reader comments per 15 top viewed Knol | 34 |
| Average number of readers that gave the 15 Knols a rating | 141 |
| Average rating % that the 15 Knols achieved from their readers | 87% (i.e. readers Really liked it or Loved it) |
So what does Knol's Help Team want?
- Do be clinical (objective and thorough) and informative (tedious, but generates trust)
- Do bring your topic to life (metaphors, short stories, etc., that help readers discover their relationship with the topic, e.g., empathy)
- Do explain technical terms in straightforward language (your grandmother should be able to understand)
- Do focus on communicating clearly (get a volunteer language tutor if needed)
- Do follow the terms of service and content policy (got to read those first)
- Do make your statements similar to that of a textbook or informative pamphlet (sloppy sentences won't get you far)
- Do provide references, ask for reviews and display your credentials (if you believe in your work, prove it)
- Do think about how to get your readers involved in your topic (ask them to comment and challenge your suppositions and conclusions)
- Do use a more formal tone (a Knol is not a blog, and the Google audio badge awaits those who write on the formal side)
- Do voice your opinion (you have always wanted to do this, right? It can be challenging but trust embossed with integrity is what you will be producing)
- Don’t post advertisements (you know your motives -- it is potentially more rewarding to deliver a genuine unit of knowledge that ends with a link to your commercial site, than to blatantly use the Knol as an ad. Save yourself from getting flagged and perhaps blocked)
- Don’t use jargon (unless your Knol is about jargon)
- Don’t use the informal conversational style, common in blog entries (repetition for good reason)
- Don't write a blog (repitition again. This is getting repetitive)
The 5 strategies Peter and Murry use to write Knols
that rank Top 10
- Write for your readers... ONLY (not for SEO)
- Turn your Knol into an investment (treat it like a garden that needs frequent attention)
- Be 100% unique in content (if you don't have a strong opinion backed by substantial knowledge and offers of proof for your thesis or topic, don't write the Knol)
- Relationships first - money second (it is well known that successful authors jump to the reader side to evaluate and revise their words in an endless effort to build a writer-reader relationship)
- Aim at AUTHOR...ity. (opinions are like anuses: everybody has one. Successful writers engage in research that allows them to achieve an authoritative voice by demonstration).
1 - Write for your readers ... ONLY
Write what your readers are expecting to read, in the way that they expect to read it; i.e. answer presumed questions with original, informative and appropriately researched content that deals comprehensively with the promise contained in your Knol's title and introduction.
#4 - Image source by Richard Masoner - flickr.comPeter says, "Place your complete focus on writing the best possible article for the reader. Avoid being dominated by the math of Search Engine Optimization. For the most part, I find it a distraction, that while an SEO effort might add something to the visibility of my article, the benefit will be small compared with spending the same energy on simply writing a better article. SEO may help get your article seen, but it is reader satisfaction from a good read that generates the critical referrals. I would rather earn one satisfied, referring and repeating human contact than 100 search hits on an article that did not deliver on a promise."
Murry adds "The current state of the Internet seems to be rewarding SEO efforts instead of reader interests, evidenced by two metrics:
- The sheer number of job opportunities stressing SEO skills that are needed to help companies achieve higher rank for their internet activities; and
- The declining quality of top-ranked results (generated by tactical SEO). This has prompted new search engine competition. Microsoft has made a strong entry with Bing, positioned as the "decision engine" rather than merely a search engine. The entry is bolstered by an expensive national advertising and sponsorship campaign that signifies Microsoft's seriousness. This campaign is an anti-standard SEO position. It emphasizes utility and pragmatic considerations ahead of keywords, key phrases and other standard SEO tactics.
"Of course, Google and Yahoo are adjusting to meet (and beat) Bing. Microsoft is doing a huge favor for consumers with this effort, even if they ultimately lose the battle to Google. It will take time -- years, not months -- to see if Bing tops Google. Readers are getting the benefit. When I perform searches, I want what Bing promises. At times, my searches are vague and immature. By putting content analysis ahead of keywords, the results from initial search should help me sharpen and focus my effort, quickly leading me to the results I really want. And this is how I write Knols: giving readers what they expect to get. Is it possible that Bing searches will deliver more top-ranked Knols than Google in consumer search? I'm watching."Another point Peter follows is to design the Knol with an educational bias or flavor. By this I mean, don’t just tell the story or list the facts - try to inform with the object of passing on knowledge and understanding to the reader. Turn what you know into potential learning for your reader. Teaching is my background I know, but I am sure others could adopt this approach to achieve the results detailed above. This educational bias also allows me to place a preferred Knol summary with bullet points on Open Learning university sites that link back to the authoritative Knol carrying the more comprehensive coverage of the topic, should the student require it. I have also developed an educational Knol Vocational Training Template that was designed to help other Knol writers convert their knowledge into this learning format. Check it out ... it may help get your Knol ranked in the Top 10, sooner than you could have imagined.The key to giving the reader what thay want, is to make the Knol a great user experience. So, get the Knol layout, grammar and spelling right first. Then Include plenty of other related media like New Yorker cartoons, YouTube videos, diagrams, photos, Wordle.net and throw in some quotes from others or from your own making, if you are brave enough. Either way, it all goes to making it a great user experience.
Another thing you could do to make for a better reader experience is to learn some HTML or, if you like, copy some of the code that I have used in this Knol in the 'text boxes', 'Table row colors' and image borders. Link to my Knol on HTML add-ons for Knols for more help.Note: If you do use a photo resource like Flickr then make sure you select only those with a Creative Commons license and that give you the right to use the photo commercially (i.e. because of the AdSense connection). Also make sure you attribute it according to the author's requirements.
2 - Turn your Knol into an investment
![]() |
| #5 - Image Source By paparutzi - Flickr.com |
3 - Be 100% unique in content & site choice
![]() |
| Image Source #3 - By Gisela Giardino - flickr.com |
4 - Relationship first - money second
5 - Aim at AUTHOR...ity
| Dale Beaumont from www.GetPublishedSecrets.com |
| Top 30 Authors AREA |
# |
POSITION |
| University or Technical College | ||
|
| 1 | Vice Chair |
|
| 6 | Professors |
|
| 1 | Clinical Instructor |
|
| 2 | Lecturers |
|
| 3 | Students |
| Technology | ||
|
| 1 | Software Engineer |
|
| 1 | Programmer |
| Professions | ||
|
| 1 | Senior Lawyer |
|
| 1 | Engineer |
|
| 1 | Pharmaceutical Biotechnology R&D Advisor |
|
| 1 | Psychologist |
| Specific Field Experts | ||
|
| 1 | Veteran |
|
| 1 | Magazine publisher |
|
| 1 | Hunting, fishing, camping |
|
| 2 | Artists |
|
| 2 | Photographers |
| Not defined | 4 | Anon |
Conclusion - Write Knols that Rank 'Top 10'
![]() |
| How to write Knols that rank 'Top 10' - www.wordle.net |
"To deliver a world-class, comprehensive and eminently affordable education to every person on the planet - anytime, anywhere, on topics relevant to their need and at a pace suitable to their learning preference, ability and start-point"
OK, that's my beef ... but I believe that through the platform of the Knol project, I have been given an opportunity to 'hitch my wagon to a rising star' and being the entrepreneur that I am – that’s exactly what I am doing and will continue to do.
| Johathan Roper (Australia) gives good writing tips |
- Write engaging, informative and well researched articles
- Don't just write to get ranked (SEO)
- Write to promote learning and education, not just the facts
- Add plenty of visual media (at least 7 and make 1 a video)
- Write a 3,000+ word article
- Take one section of the Knol, re-write and post to other sites or forums with link-back.
- Use appropriate grammar, correct spelling & clear explanations
- Commit to making it better. Constantly revise. Look to improve often.
- Format by sections. Include opening, closing & section summaries
- Write your Knol with 100% original content (not so much in ideas, but in expression)
- Post on the net just once - as a Knol
- Request action from KnolHelp on identified plagiarized work
- Don't just default to AdSense and don't make it your focus in writing.
- Decide the content areas that you will not use AdSense. i.e. sensitive expert areas.
- Don't over commercialize with too many links back to commercial sites.
- Respect your reader's intelligence. If the interest is great, one link is enough
- Build goodwill with the reader first, before considering commercialization.
- Write a Knol as you would a chapter of a 'soon to be published' book.
- Write with the intent of being acknowledged as an authority in your field
- Don't publish junk or allow a poorly viewed article to remain in your portfolio - Rewrite or remove
- Write only in your field of expertise. Carve out your niche using your unique, uncommon or highly contextualized knowledge
- Qualify and support your Knol with appropriate references and extensive links to authoritative sites. (aim at 20 of these links)
- Actively participate in the community - Provide reviews, comments and suggestions where appropriate.
- Give yourself a 5 Stars before publishing - if you have done all this, you deserve it!
Peter Baskerville is a lecturer and facilitator of entrepreneurial education at Southbank Institute of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. He mounts courses and mentors student entrepreneurs in a role he calls "New Venture Architect." He holds a degree and awards in finance, accounting and entrepreneurial education; is recognized in Australia as Content Expert in Entrepreneurship and is Entrepreneur in Residence at Southbank. Peter has written 28 Knols and is currently ranked third among Knol's top pick English language authors. Murry Shohat is deeply experienced, widely published. Reporter, editor, strategic and tactical PR, outbound and inbound marketing, articles, research, positioning, press releases, white papers, case studies, SEO, newsletters, desktop publishing design templates. My work spans conceptual, analytical, interpretive, journalistic, and persuasive projects. Experience in high technology, real estate, dentistry and health care, aerospace, law, general business, B-B and B-C. Located in California's vino-licious wine country, my education includes a degree in Journalism and post-grad work in Business. Murry has authored or co-authored 16 Knols and is currently ranked second among Knol's top pick English language authors. |
- #1 - Image source - 4 Authors - Public Domain WikiMedia Commons - uploaded 18 January 2009
- #2 - Image source - http://www.flickr.com/photos/tracy_olson/61056391/ Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic by Tracy O - uploaded 18 January 2009
- #3 - Image source - by TheAlieness GiselaGiardino²³ - uploaded 18 January 2009, Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic http://www.flickr.com/photos/gi/43208610/
- #4 - Image source - by richardmasoner uploaded 18 January 2009, Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic http://www.flickr.com/photos/bike/248030268/
- #5 - Image Source - by paparutzi Attribution 2.0 Generic - uploaded 18 January 2009 http://www.flickr.com/photos/paparutzi/285865099/
| DESCRIPTION | LINK |
| How to use HTML to enhanse the presentation of your Knol | HTML for your Knol |
| How to add Google Analytics to your Knols to get readership details. | Knol Analytics Guide |
| How to write a Knol as a learning tool using a preset template. | Vocational Training Template Knol |
| How to quickly write a basic article review for a Knol. | Basic Article Review for a Knol |
| How to write a powerful advanced article review for a Knol. | Advanced Article Review for a Knol |
| Tips on how to write best practice Knols | Knol Writing Tips |















Murry Shohat
Commenting for P.V. Ariel
Great Work
Peter, You have done a wonderful job here, this info is very useful and i appreciate you for the pain you've taken to present this knol with lot of illustrations. I am saving this piece for my further reference, i learned a lot from this. May the Lord continue to bless and fill with His wisdom to create more such knols for the knol writers as well as the readers. Philip Ariel, Secunderabad, AP, India
[backlinks removed]
Peter responded:
Thanks for taking the time to comment. I'm glad you found the Knol useful.
Murry responded:
The comment is very welcome. Those links the writer included are not. I've nothing against the content of those links except for the fact they have nothing to so with this knol and are thus backlinks that benefit Mr. Ariel.
ps: the title of the next comment is well placed: ethical SEO. There is nothing ethical about placing backlinks that have zero to do with the topic. Such efforts are greed in disguise. Shame on Ariel. If you survey his comment history, he's trying to hook his star to a lot of successful Knols. I think there is a commandment about that (Thou shalt not covet thy neighbors Knols).
EditSaveCancelDeleteDeleteBlock this userReport abusive commentHide report window
Thanks.
EditSaveCancelDeleteDeleteBlock this userReport abusive commentHide report window
EditSaveCancelDeleteDeleteBlock this userReport abusive commentHide report window
Jagadeesh M
Invite as author
Ethical SEO
I took the below line from your knol in double quotes
"I see and understand the value in finding the perfect match between the content of the article and the math of search engine algorithms, together with clever keyword writing strategies." plus User experience
The line mentioned is Ethical SEO and please don't mix it with Unethical SEO that manipulates search results. Totally don't tell it as SEO
Another line from your Knol below in double quotes
"This Knol has no SEO considerations in it beyond those that occur naturally from the creation of solid content."
No Knol platform does it for you and I don't say your content is not quality. I always like to read except few to agree regarding SEO
Ideas to optimize knol articles to Rank in First page (SEO + Knol Platform + Quality Content) - http://knol.google.c
Hope the points helps and mainly the 4th point
Best,
Jag
Krishan Maggon
Invite as author
Blind search test: bing vs yahoo vs google
http://blindsearch.f
I tested the site for some of the key words related to knols and each time ended up voting for google, although bing results were good match and yahoo was way off the mark in some searches. Of the 10 knols tested, all of them came out as No 1 on Page 1 on bing, yahoo and google. On yahoo, 2 knols were in position 2 or 3. Google results were better because it gave collections or other related knols as well on Page 1. Knols coming out ahead of commercial research reports in all 3 results is a good outcome
EditSaveCancelDeleteDeleteBlock this userReport abusive commentHide report window
Best,
Jag
EditSaveCancelDeleteDeleteBlock this userReport abusive commentHide report window
EditSaveCancelDeleteDeleteBlock this userReport abusive commentHide report window
Krishan Maggon
Invite as author
New comparison sites
I have used the following sites for comparative results on google, yahoo and bing. I hope that soon there will be a new site to compare all three results.
http://bing-vs-googl
http://www.langreite
You may try this for the 3 glearch.com
Best,
Jag
EditSaveCancelDeleteDeleteBlock this userReport abusive commentHide report window
Thanks for the site. There must be a bug, I tried it twice and both times my PC was blocked. The site gave only google and bing results and failed to give yahoo results with the test words. Bing and google results were OK.
EditSaveCancelDeleteDeleteBlock this userReport abusive commentHide report window
EditSaveCancelDeleteDeleteBlock this userReport abusive commentHide report window
Thanks for looking into it. I will ask the site owner to check for fixes if any and hope you people would have checked dogpile.com the first comparison SE
Best,
Jag
EditSaveCancelDeleteDeleteBlock this userReport abusive commentHide report window
madhav king
Invite as author
How to write Knols that rank ‘Top 10’
http://www.stellarin
EditSaveCancelDeleteDeleteBlock this userReport abusive commentHide report window
EditSaveCancelDeleteDeleteBlock this userReport abusive commentHide report window
Murry Shohat
The Looming Impact of BING
So, we are beginning to include BING in the conversation inside of the Knol. Why? Because BING is staking out the position of "decision engine" instead of search engine. This means that BING may be looking more at content than keywords and key phrases, as well as the many other tactical tricks in the SEO tool chest. Since we argue entirely in favor of content, BING success could make it the best search engine for Knol. In the short term. And Microsoft has put its money on the line with a huge advertising campaign as well as key event sponsorships. A massive expenditure that speaks volumes about the richest company in the world.
We are not giving up on Google. I for one really like the positioning of BING. Search should be about helping the searcher make decisions when solution-seeking searches are conducted. Well-structured, content rich, fact checked, illustrated and referenced Knols should hunt well under this paradigm. Peter?
Ultimately, the sustainability of the cyber world will be built on it's ability to parallel the real one, and the real one has been built throughout the ages on people, their interrelationship and their ability to create, evaluate and share information. I think it is time for search engines to incorporate the people's judgments via the democratization of knowledge or face the real risk of obsolesce with the paradigm shift to 'decision engine'.
Algorithms were an answer for the commercial models of their owners but are now failing to be the answer for their problem/solution driven users. This is a dangerous situation to be in for any commercial enterprise. Maybe Google could use the Knol Platform as a test bed for this fast evolving paradigm of 'decision engine'? We can only hope Murry!
EditSaveCancelDeleteDeleteBlock this userReport abusive commentHide report window
EditSaveCancelDeleteDeleteBlock this userReport abusive commentHide report window
EditSaveCancelDeleteDeleteBlock this userReport abusive commentHide report window
EditSaveCancelDeleteDeleteBlock this userReport abusive commentHide report window
The question was why some of my preferred knols were not getting PV, badges etc.
Links from pharmaceutical, biotechnology and market research industry, NIH, FDA, universities increased the visibility of some of the knols. On the other hand, copyright infringements and false claims by e publishers did the same for few other knols.
The page rank gives a higher value to the endorsements by edu and gov.
I hope it diffrentiates between good gov. and dictatorships and high and poor quality universities.
EditSaveCancelDeleteDeleteBlock this userReport abusive commentHide report window
EditSaveCancelDeleteDeleteBlock this userReport abusive commentHide report window
Peter Baskerville
SEO Vs Quality Content
For example, my Knol on a generic term 'Open Online Learning', was written completely without SEO and initially it did not rate anywhere, yet now it hovers between #1 & #2 from 76 million searches. I suspect this is because of links from other high ranking sites (Universities) who have done so via the age old medium of peer referral. i.e. someone read the article and told a friend/peer to check it out who linked to it and told a friend/peer to check it out who linked to it and told a friend/peer ..... This aspect has always been at the epicentre of the Google search engine. My readers may not have linked had they suspected that they had been 'tricked' into reading in the first place.
Sure SEO gets traffic but the article I described above gets enthusiasts & followers. As I see it, a sustainable business is built on the latter which is why I focus my writing on attracting them.
As for Knol ... it's the best platform for online content and is backed by the best people in the business. When the 'Beta' adjustments are complete and Knol is linked into the Google suite of products, the exposure/promotion will take Knol to the top. Smart people are hitching their wagons to this rising star now and simply using other sites to link back to their Knols.
Should Knol fail to achieve strategic differentiation through writer and reader action, I will migrate elsewhere. But I agree that peer referral is the key, and search is the engine.
EditSaveCancelDeleteDeleteBlock this userReport abusive commentHide report window
Since you contents are in knol, authors and visitors of knol read and recognize it and vote by linking and bookmarking the knols and if you think of having your content in a domain where visitors and search engine spider don't know about it then it’s hard time
BTW, I like your efforts and contribution in knol platform :)
Looking for more quality knol. We can always go along if you have any :)
Murry, Continuing with our discussion. For unbranded domain content is a king and SEO is the crown :)
Thanks,
Jag
EditSaveCancelDeleteDeleteBlock this userReport abusive commentHide report window
Jagadeesh M
Invite as author
Question?
There are many many factors behind SEOs. Resources and fresh content in a popular domain always taste good for searches. BTW, your contents are Good and useful :)
Best,
Jag
As a practical matter, I don't even think about SEO until my work earns traction the old fashioned way.
EditSaveCancelDeleteDeleteBlock this userReport abusive commentHide report window
EditSaveCancelDeleteDeleteBlock this userReport abusive commentHide report window
Several Knol writers have also put up Blogs about Knol, and they do poorly (primarily because they lack attractive content; but also because they fail at system-level SEO).
My writing team - Krishan, Peter and myself - have studied Internet success and believe that we understand the dynamics. If Google continues to support Knol, it's really #1 for our kind of articles.
EditSaveCancelDeleteDeleteBlock this userReport abusive commentHide report window
I appreciate your work and support for your team.
And you may remember about the knol "Ways to promote Knol Site and Knol Articles" http://knol.google.c
Now there are other options to all useful links for the authors and visitors and the knol is been updated regularly.
Thanks,
Jag
EditSaveCancelDeleteDeleteBlock this userReport abusive commentHide report window
But the real disappointment is your selection of a co-author whose body of work is one of the WORST examples on Knol. We ask you to engage in clear critical thinking about the advocacy of your co-author. It is not the way to Knol success. It may seem "charming" to push for more authors who then set a target of writing a hundred knols. But that is absurd on its face. How about simply advocating for a single excellent Knol? With excellence being the objective. Success will then breed success and more knols will flow.
If Knol actually becomes the publishing site for the kind of work your co-author produces, and this somehow attracts clones, only Google will benefit as they hang their head in shame for hosting the planet's biggest garbage dump. Even garbage dumps have consumers and scavengers. And my group and groups and individuals like us will be long gone.
The real target of authorship must be quality. To produce useless low page view Knols as your co-author does is killing Knol and no amount of SEO or promotion of that crap is going to help. Nor is his altruistic advocacy that has no anchor points in quality work.
I hope you revisit the thrust of your Knol and align it with a more positive direction forward.
EditSaveCancelDeleteDeleteBlock this userReport abusive commentHide report window
I know you will call me here, thanks :)
The Knols list is on "Update". I hope it will be completed soon.
As well, Other than "Rank top 10" I have mentioned few team knols like "HTML Tips", "Tips-Templates" and "Writing Tips" and many Knol Help stuff and events.And the Knol deals with areas of different subject and techniques.
As you know I am trying the best to inform co-author about the actual Knol success. I have again commented few on the original discussion.
And certainly I will be working on the points mentioned that can produce quality work as I hope co-author will agree for doing the best.
Best,
Jag
EditSaveCancelDeleteDeleteBlock this userReport abusive commentHide report window
I see deeply into the heart of the matter and confirm your excellence as a Knol writer. You have a full grasp of the medium as well as the message.
As the owner of your Knol you have the ability to remove another writer. I just exercised that ability on a team knol where one of the writers, having made no contribution, did not deserve the page views. I understand the need for diplomacy and tact (and I am not good at either).
EditSaveCancelDeleteDeleteBlock this userReport abusive commentHide report window
My view is that if we all start unpublishing Knols that have not gained pageviews, comments or ratings after a period of say three months, then Knol would be a better product .... and better products makes for a more successful and sustainable business. Hopefully your co-authors will follow your lead on writing quality Knols.
Thanks again for your support on Knol's future being about quality rather than just quantity.
EditSaveCancelDeleteDeleteBlock this userReport abusive commentHide report window
I know you are hard and as well as soft. You raise your voice against unethical stuff that is the reason I like you and your straightforward comments.
Peter, Yes I have seen those and that is the reason you always rank TOP of Tops ;)
I go with your lines. Few people will take time. Waiting for that. I am trying things again since the co-author has the ability to produce quality Knol.
And you're welcome for the thanking.
Best,
Jag
EditSaveCancelDeleteDeleteBlock this userReport abusive commentHide report window
Krishan Maggon
Invite as author
Untitled
This is the knol which attracted me to the knol and as an alternative platform for publication. For me it was a very convincing arguement. I had recently checked my knols which mostly come out on Page 1 and even number 1 in searches.
Can you update your ranking Table with current data to confirm the Jan figures and add MSN as well. Why the top ranked knols have higher word count 4000 or more than high impact articles with 800-2000 words?
Looking at my Analytics, I am not as convinced as I was about the 4,000 word Knol as the standard. My average readers spend 4.3 minutes per knol and if the average reader reads at say 300 words per minute, then just maybe our Knols should be mostly set at around 1,300 words.
Even so, it is still greater than the typical article marketing site of 400 - 800. This does not mean that we should not target some Knols at the 4,000-10,000 words when the topic requires it (i.e. Open Online Learning).
Hey and I did not realise that I could influence someone of your status to come here and write. That's one the Knol Team owe me!
EditSaveCancelDeleteDeleteBlock this userReport abusive commentHide report window
I think in a way, many of my knols require 2-3 min only with just the data and discussion and common stuff covered only in few knols. So the 800-2000 rule (for scientific, technical and medical topics) is still valid.
I have added some visuals in several of my knols and was finally able to get photos, slides (still lots of problems) added and revised most of my Tables. Have a look at one of them and let me know your opinion.
EditSaveCancelDeleteDeleteBlock this userReport abusive commentHide report window
Charleston Lenard Lim
Invite as author
Indispensible Advice! Great Knol!
EditSaveCancelDeleteDeleteBlock this userReport abusive commentHide report window